Reviews
“Istanbul, Open City offers two major contributions that I would like to highlight. First, bringing forth the perspective of the urban imaginary, the book offers insights into the scholarship on Istanbul, which has evolved dramatically over time. While the first generation of urban scholars in the 1960s and 1970s emphasized the problems stemming from rapid urbanization within the context of the developing economy, later research in the 1980s and 1990s shifted the lens toward the social, political, and spatial effects of globalization. Recently, a major strand within the field specifically explores the ways in which neoliberal urbanism has transformed the city’s physical and social space during the AKP era. It is against this backdrop that the book, by unpacking how subjectivities are produced and molded through an examination of urban imaginaries, engages with crucial aspects of urban modernity that have hitherto been understudied due to the hegemony of the perspective of urban political economy. Second, demonstrating continuities in terms of uncertainties embedded in urban experience, the book not only provides an account of modernity within a non-Western context, but also challenges methodological tendencies prevalent in Istanbul studies. Unlike the previous sociological, political, and architectural histories of the city, which have predominantly focused either on the modernization of the nineteenth-century Ottoman capital or the nation-building process of the early republican era, it examines communalities, overlaps, and tensions through a more expansive span of time from the 1950s to today and thus reconstructs a persuasive genealogy of the present.” Firat Genç. İpek Türeli, Istanbul, Open City: Exhibiting Anxieties of Urban Modernity. New Perspectives on Turkey (2021): 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1017/npt.2021.7
“Istanbul Open City will interest students and scholars of the Middle East engaged in urban history, architecture, and the built environment, as well as those interested in questions of visual culture and cultural heritage. The bringing together of these often-isolated disciplinary fields is perhaps the greatest strength of the book, and the source of its many valuable insights into urban culture. I have no doubt that Türeli’s work will lead to more scholarly engagement with the concept of the ‘open city.’” Virginie Rey. Review of Türeli, Ipek, Istanbul Open City: Exhibiting Anxieties of Urban Modernity. H-Urban, H-Net Reviews. October, 2018. http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=52941
“Istanbul, Open City provides a new way to think about the role that images play in shaping urban experience. In this careful exploration of the complex visual cultures that have defined Istanbul since the 1950s, Ipek Türeli both contributes to a rich body of scholarship on Istanbul and sketches out a methodological and conceptual intervention that should appeal to those studying how cities come to be experienced as rich sites—and sights—of meaning.” Timur Hammond, Istanbul, Open City: Exhibiting Anxieties of Urban Modernity, The American Association of Geographers Review of Books, 7, no. 3 (2019): 172-174, https://doi.org/10.1080/2325548X.2019.1615317
“Istanbul, Open City represents a rich contribution to contemporary literature on the city, and its original, multicase methodology should serve as a model of the innovative ways researchers can study urban environments in their many dimensions.” Anne-Marie Broudehoux (2018). Istanbul, Open City: Exhibiting Anxieties of Urban Modernity. Traditional Dwellings and Settlements Review 29 no 2 (2018): 87-88. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26877326
Read other reviews
Burak Edim (2020). “Double review of Istanbul, Open City: Exhibiting Anxieties of Urban Modernity and Hotels and Highways: The Construction of Modernization Theory in Cold War Turkey.” International Journal of Islamic Architecture (IJIA) 9, no 1: 193-197. Ella Fratantuono (2020). “Review Essay: Building Authoritarianism in Turkey,” Journal of Urban History 46, no. 6: 1420-1425. [A triple review of Istanbul Open City, along with Kezer’s Building Modern Turkey and Batuman’s New Islamist Architecture and Urbanism]. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0096144220934790 Timur Hammmond (2019). “Review: Istanbul Open City: Exhibiting Anxieties of Urban Modernity.” The American Association of Geographers (AAG) Review of Books 7, no. 3 (July): 172-4. https://doi.org/10.1080/2325548X.2019.1615317 Rey, Virginie. “Review: Istanbul Open City: Exhibiting Anxieties of Urban Modernity.” H-Urban, H-Net Reviews (October). https://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=52941 Broudeaux, Anne-Marie, “Review: Istanbul Open City: Exhibiting Anxieties of Urban Modernity.” Traditional Dwellings and Settlements Review 29 no. 2: 87-8. Kayhan, Sezer. Review: Istanbul Open City: Exhibiting Anxieties of Urban Modernity.” Journal of Visual Culture 17, no. 2: 253-56. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1470412918793471

Go Back